Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure of design professionals.
Sponsor
Full profile: /officials/J000302
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Cosponsors (1)
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
Latest Action
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Plain-English Summary
Congress is expressing its view that states should require design professionals—such as architects and engineers—to be licensed in order to protect public health and safety. The measure reflects concern that proper licensing standards ensure these professionals have adequate training and qualifications before they can design buildings and infrastructure that affect people's lives. This is a statement of congressional opinion rather than a law that would directly change licensing requirements.
AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.
Affected Industries
Industries and interest groups with a stake in how this bill is resolved. Compare with each member's outside-money backers on their finance page.
Why this matters: Look up any member who voted on this bill and check their finance page — do the industries listed above match the groups funding their campaigns? That's the kind of connection this tool is built to help you find.
Subjects
Full Bill Text
Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Con. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. CON. RES. 47 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure of design professionals. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 4, 2025 Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce _______________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure of design professionals. Whereas the several States have traditionally licensed individuals in the practice of certain design occupations, with California having passed the first surveying licensure law in 1891, Illinois having passed the first architecture licensing law in 1897, and Wyoming having passed the first engineering licensure law in 1907; Whereas all 50 States, as well as territories and possessions, license individuals in the design profession disciplines; Whereas the National Transportation Safety Board has recognized the importance of professional licensing among certain design professions, most recently in NTSB/PSR-18/02, an incident safety report regarding a natural gas distribution system in the northeast region of the Merrimack Valley, Massachusetts; Whereas, more than 30 years ago, Congress recognized the importance of professional licensing in design disciplines in its report titled ``Structural Failures in Public Facilities'' (H. Rept. 98-61), which recommended ``all necessary architectural and engineering design and on- site services in public construction projects are furnished by licensed professionals who are qualified and experienced to assure the construction of safe structures''; and Whereas many States are reducing requirements for, or eliminating the licensing of, certain occupations due to concerns over competition, market entry, and overregulation that do not serve the public interest, but in many cases the aforementioned State actions do not distinguish those professional design occupations in which licensing has a significant benefit to public health, safety, and welfare: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that-- (1) occupations in design professions, including but not limited to architecture, engineering, surveying, and mapping, are essential to the integrity of the built and natural environment and critical to the successful research, planning, design, construction, development, alteration, repair, operation, and maintenance of real property, the Nation's physical infrastructure, and resource planning activities, including the assessment, location, and development of critical materials, that contribute to maintaining the country's economic prosperity, national security, and environmental protection; and (2) continuation of licensure of such occupations and professions by the several States is in the best interest of public health, safety, and welfare. <all>
Related legislation
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.
- HR1703Choices for Increased Mobility Act of 2025Reported by Committee · 2026-05-21
- HR8375Medicare Advantage Improvement Act of 2026Referred to Committee · 2026-04-27
- HR8414DAIRY PRIDE ActReferred to Committee · 2026-04-21
- HR8413SECURE Data ActReferred to Committee · 2026-04-21