Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics

Data Last Updated

Bills & Votes: 3 hours ago
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HR10864Referred to Committee

San Carlos Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 2026

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-10-22
Introduced
0
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Elijah Crane
Elijah Crane
Republican · AZ · Representative
Votes with party: 85.3% (658 recorded votes)
Top industries funding sponsor:
  • Conservative Groups$496k

Full profile: /officials/C001132

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (0)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

2026-10-22

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • House Committee on Natural ResourcesReferred To · 2026-10-22

Plain-English Summary

Plain-English summary pending. Introduced on 2026-10-22. Check back soon — summaries are generated as bills progress through Congress.

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 10864 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 10864 To provide for the divestiture of certain properties of the San Carlos Irrigation Project in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 22, 2026 Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To provide for the divestiture of certain properties of the San Carlos Irrigation Project in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``San Carlos Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Findings.--The Congress finds the following: (1) To provide water for irrigating, first, land allotted to Pima Indians on the Gila River Reservation and, second, other lands in public or private ownership which, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior, could be served without diminishing the supply necessary for the Indian lands, Congress, by the Act of June 7, 1924, authorized construction of Coolidge Dam and creation of San Carlos Reservoir on the Gila River in Arizona. (2) The Secretary, through the San Carlos Irrigation Project (SCIP) administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, operates Coolidge Dam and approximately two hundred irrigation wells to provide water to SCIP lands on the Gila River Reservation and to the SCIP lands outside the reservation which is within the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District. (3) A hydroelectric power system was developed at Coolidge Dam pursuant to the Act of March 7, 1928, as amended, to generate power incidental to the use of San Carlos Reservoir for storing irrigation water. The system's primary purpose was to provide power for irrigation pumping on SCIP lands and for BIA agency and school purposes and for irrigation pumping by Apache Indians on the San Carlos Reservation. (4) SCIP's transmission and distribution electric system, which has been extended to domestic and commercial users on SCIP lands and to other homes and businesses not on SCIP lands, currently provides service within portions of Pinal, Pima, Maricopa, Graham, and Gila Counties covering approximately 2,400 square miles. (5) Unexpectedly low and erratic Gila River flows into San Carlos Reservoir since 1928 have limited power generation at Coolidge Dam, causing SCIP to secure additional power through market purchases, contracts with the Western Area Power Administration, the Salt River Project, and Arizona Public Service Company to meet its customers' needs. Since October 1988, when a flood damaged the switchyard at Coolidge Dam, no power has been generated at the dam. (6) Much of SCIP's power system needs modernization, with some facilities over eighty years old, well past their design life. However, Federal budgetary and administrative policies have impaired long-range, consistent planning and construction necessary for efficient SCIP operation and maintenance and for timely replacement of obsolete or worn-out facilities. (7) Based on these conditions, Congress, by the San Carlos Indian Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 1991, authorized the Secretary of the Interior to transfer the electrical transmission and distribution system of SCIP to the Gila River Indian Community, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and several Arizona utilities, consistent with the agreements entered into between and among them. (8) The agreements related to the San Carlos Indian Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 1991 have since expired and the issues prompting the first divestiture have persisted. (9) Because SCIP is subject to…
Show the remaining 940 wordsHide the remaining 940 words
Federal procedures and regulations, it has been challenging to acquire long-term contracts for power and instead relies on short-term contracts and the day ahead market. As a result, SCIP's services to approximately 10,000 residential customers are both expensive and unreliable. (10) Additionally, SCIP requires infrastructure updates. SCIP is unable to raise money for new infrastructure through bonds, which has resulted in increased customer rates. (11) The Arizona Legislature, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Gila River Indian Community, the San Carlos Apache Indian Tribe, and the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District have petitioned the Congress to authorize the Secretary to divest the United States of ownership and responsibility for SCIP's electric power transmission and distribution systems and to take such other actions as necessary to carry out divestiture. (12) The Gila River Indian Community Utility Authority, Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. Graham County Electric Cooperative, Inc., the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District, Electrical District No. 2 of Pinal County, Arizona, Electrical District No. 3 of Pinal County, Arizona, Electrical District No. 4 of Pinal County, Arizona, and Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District, Arizona (collectively the ``Not for Profit Utilities Group'') have established principles by which divestiture and continued service to SCIP customers would be implemented between and among them, subsequent to enactment of Federal enabling authorities as provided in this Act. The Not- for-Profit Utilities Group's agreed upon principles provide a prudent method for ensuring safe, reliable, cost-effective, and long-term electric service to the residents and businesses currently served by SCIP. (b) Purpose.--The purposes of this Act are-- (1) to authorize the Secretary to divest the United States of ownership of the electric transmission and distribution system of the San Carlos Irrigation Project; (2) to facilitate the implementation of divestiture in an orderly and economic manner, consistent with the principles of the Not-for-Profit Utilities Group and with due regard for the rights and interests of current SCIP customers and employees; (3) to support the long-term provision of safe, reliable, and cost-effective power to the existing customers of SCIP by the Not-for-Profit Utilities Group; (4) to provide for the reallocation of power resources currently allocated to SCIP from Federal hydroelectric power sources to the Not-for-Profit Utilities Group; and (5) to assist the Gila River Indian Community and the San Carlos Apache Tribe in their efforts to achieve greater self- determination and economic self-sufficiency. SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) SCIP.--The term ``SCIP'' means the San Carlos Irrigation Project authorized pursuant to the Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 475), expanded pursuant to the Act of March 7, 1928 (45 Stat. 200, 210), and administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2) SCIP electric system.--The term ``SCIP electric system'' means all electric transmission and distribution facilities, including existing associated easements, owned by the United States on behalf of SCIP and administered by SCIP's Power Division, except Coolidge Dam, the electric generating facilities within the dam's powerhouse, the lines connecting the powerhouse with the switchyard, together with such switchyard located on land withdrawn for Coolidge Dam. (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 4. DIVESTITURE. (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the Act of September 22, 1961 (26 U.S.C. 16) and the San Carlos Indian Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-231), the Secretary is directed to transfer the SCIP electric system and associated assets. (b) Coordination.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall create a plan for the transfer of the SCIP electric system and associated assets in coordination with the appropriate representatives of affected Federal, State, Tribal, local, and private entities. (c) Administrative Costs.-- (1) In general.--The entity or entities to which the SCIP electric system and associated assets are transferred shall be responsible for the administrative costs associated with the transfer. (2) Request for funds.--If the Secretary determines that Federal funds may be necessary to facilitate the transfer of the SCIP electric system and associated assets under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress all necessary documentation and information necessary to demonstrate the need for such funding. (d) Reversion Does Not Apply.--Section 10(b) of the San Carlos Indian Irrigation Project Divestiture Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-231) shall not apply with respect to the transfer of the SCIP electric system and associated assets under this Act. (e) Arizona Water Settlement.--The divestiture under subsection (a) shall not relieve the Secretary of any responsibilities with respect to SCIP under section 203(d)(1)(B) of the Arizona Water Settlements Act (Public Law 108-451). SEC. 5. BIA ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTRACTS. (a) In General.--With respect to any electric utility systems operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Secretary is authorized to contract under such terms and conditions as the Secretary considers to be in the best interest of the Federal Government and the Indian Tribe served by such electric utility system for the sale, operation, maintenance, repairs, or relocation of Government-owned utilities and utility systems and appurtenances used in the administration of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to such Indian Tribe or other entity as the Tribe and the Secretary may agree. (b) Submission to Congress.--The Secretary shall not execute a contract pursuant to this section until after submitting to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a copy of the contract and a statement of the reasons for proposing the contract, and until such materials have lain before the Committees for 60 days (excluding the time during which either House is in recess for more than three days) unless prior thereto the Secretary is notified that neither committee has any objection to the proposed contract. <all>
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HR837To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
    Enacted into Law · 2026-10-20
  • HR10753Tribal Veterans Voucher Flexibility Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-10-06
  • HR10754Rural Disaster Fairness Act of 2026
    Referred to Committee · 2026-10-06
  • HR10656Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-10-01