Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics

Data Last Updated

Bills & Votes: 1 hour ago
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HR5437Referred to Committee

Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2025-09-17
Introduced
16
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Tom McClintock
Tom McClintock
Republican · CA · Representative
Votes with party: 92.5% (586 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/M001177

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (16)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

  • Andy Biggs (R-AZ-5)Original· 2025-09-17
  • Tom Emmer (R-MN-6)· 2025-09-18
  • Brian Jack (R-GA-3)· 2025-11-12
  • Darrell Issa (R-CA-48)· 2025-11-12
  • Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (R-GA-1)· 2025-11-12
  • Pete Stauber (R-MN-8)· 2025-11-12
  • Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ-2)· 2025-11-20
  • Brad Finstad (R-MN-1)· 2026-01-07
  • Laurel M. Lee (R-FL-15)· 2026-02-02
  • Aaron Bean (R-FL-4)· 2026-04-14
  • Russell Fry (R-SC-7)· 2026-04-15
  • Brandon Gill (R-TX-26)· 2026-04-20
  • Richard McCormick (R-GA-7)· 2026-04-21
  • Matt Van Epps (R-TN-7)· 2026-05-13
  • Barry Loudermilk (R-GA-11)· 2026-05-20
  • Michelle Fischbach (R-MN-7)· 2026-06-03

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 7.

2026-06-03

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • House Committee on the JudiciaryMarkup By · 2026-06-03

Previously

  • House Committee on the JudiciaryReferred To · 2025-09-17
  • Judiciary CommitteeReferred To · 2025-09-17

Plain-English Summary

This bill would protect manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products (like granite and marble countertops) from being sued for injuries or illnesses allegedly caused by the products themselves, similar to protections that exist for firearms manufacturers. The law would shield these companies from lawsuits even if someone claims they got sick from exposure to dust or other hazards related to the stone slabs, though it would still allow cases involving defective products or failure to warn about dangers.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

Subjects

Law

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 5437 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5437 To prohibit civil actions brought against a manufacturer or seller of a stone slab product for harm resulting from the alteration of such a product by a fabricator, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 17, 2025 Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Biggs of Arizona) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit civil actions brought against a manufacturer or seller of a stone slab product for harm resulting from the alteration of such a product by a fabricator, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSES. (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) Civil actions have been commenced against manufacturers and sellers of certain stone slab products, including those used for kitchen countertops and similar applications. These products are not inherently dangerous and upon their manufacture and entry into the stream of commerce, they do not pose an inherent risk of injury to human beings. (2) These civil actions seek money damages from manufacturers and sellers by persons who claim personal injuries as a result of exposure to silica dust produced during the alteration of such products in the course of their employment by third-party fabricators. The manufacturers and sellers of these products have no control over these fabricators. (3) The alteration of such products is heavily regulated by Federal and State workplace safety laws and regulations, including section 1910.1053 of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, and California Labor Code Section 5204, which require a variety of safety measures that fabricators must employ in order to mitigate the risk of potential injuries posed by silica dust. However, some fabricators fail to comply with these requirements and thereby expose their employees and others to the potential harms that these laws and regulations are intended to prevent. (4) Businesses located or conducting business in the United States that are engaged in interstate and foreign commerce through the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, importation, or sale to third-parties of certain stone slab products are not responsible, and should not be held liable, for the alleged injuries caused by those who alter the product in a way that is unsafe or violates Federal and State laws and regulations. (5) The possibility of imposing liability on an entire industry for alleged injuries that are solely caused by others is an abuse of the legal system, erodes public confidence in our Nation's laws, invites the disassembly and destabilization of other industries and economic sectors lawfully competing in the free enterprise system of the United States, and constitutes an unreasonable burden on interstate and foreign commerce of the United States. (6) A proliferation of frivolous lawsuits against manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products for alleged workplace injuries caused by the actions of third-parties unrelated to and beyond the control of these manufacturers and sellers may further limit access to courts by straining the resources of the legal system and depriving deserving parties of their legitimate rights to relief. (b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are as follows: (1) To prohibit civil actions against manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products for injuries caused by exposure to respirable silica or other substances arising from or relating to the…
Show the remaining 351 wordsHide the remaining 351 words
fabrication of such products by third-parties. (2) To preserve consumers' access to a supply of stone slab products, to protect manufacturers and sellers from frivolous civil actions alleging liability for such injuries, and to preserve a lawful industry that employs tens of thousands of Americans in several States. (3) To prevent the use of such civil actions to impose unreasonable burdens on interstate and foreign commerce. (4) To exercise congressional power under article IV, section 1 of the Constitution (the Full Faith and Credit Clause). SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON BRINGING OF QUALIFIED CIVIL ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR STATE COURT. (a) In General.--A qualified civil action may not be brought in any Federal or State court. (b) Dismissal of Pending Actions.--A qualified civil action that is pending on the date of enactment of this Act shall be dismissed, as soon as is practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, by the court in which the action is pending. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Fabrication.--The term ``fabrication'' means the process of altering a qualified product by cutting, drilling, shaping, polishing, grinding, or other means. (2) Qualified civil action.--The term ``qualified civil action'' means a civil action brought against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product for injuries arising from or related to the fabrication by another party of a qualified product, including those caused by exposure to respirable silica or other substances. (3) Qualified product.--The term ``qualified product'' means a stone slab product, including such a product made with quartz, mineral, crystal, glass, porcelain, or other stone, ceramic or similar material, that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce. (4) Seller.--The term ``seller'' means an importer, a distributer, a retailer, or a supplier of a qualified product. (5) State.--The term ``State'' includes each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, and any political subdivision of any such place. <all>
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HR8454To provide for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain Federal land in the State of California, and for other purposes.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-07-01
  • HR175Deport Alien Gang Members Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-06-03
  • HR184Action Versus No Action Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-05-21
  • HR2302Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Land Transfer Act of 2025
    Passed House · 2026-05-20