
Full profile: /officials/H001096
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Currently in
When federal agencies punish someone with a sanction (like a fine or license revocation), this proposal would require courts to completely re-examine all the facts from scratch rather than just checking whether the agency followed proper procedures. Currently, courts typically give agencies significant deference and only review whether they acted reasonably, but this change would let people challenge agency punishments by having a judge conduct a full new trial on the facts. This would affect workers, businesses, and individuals facing federal agency penalties across areas like labor, environmental, and financial regulation.
AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.