Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics

Data Last Updated

Bills & Votes: 2 hours ago
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HRES1340Referred to Committee

Expressing strong opposition to the imposition of digital services taxes and other relevant similar measures by other countries that unfairly discriminate against United States companies.

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-06-04
Introduced
5
Cosponsors
HRES
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Ron Estes
Ron Estes
Republican · KS · Representative
Votes with party: 97.5% (602 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/E000298

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (5)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

  • Bradley Scott Schneider (D-IL-10)Original· 2026-06-04
  • Darin LaHood (R-IL-16)Original· 2026-06-04
  • Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19)Original· 2026-06-04
  • Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-1)Original· 2026-06-04
  • Suzan K. DelBene (D-WA-1)Original· 2026-06-04

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

2026-06-04

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • House Committee on Foreign AffairsReferred To · 2026-06-04
  • House Committee on Ways and MeansReferred To · 2026-06-04

Plain-English Summary

This resolution calls on (1) all other countries to cease and desist from implementing any digital services tax (DST) or similar measure, repeal existing DSTs, and immediately stop unfairly targeting U.S. companies; and (2) U.S. government agencies to use all available methods and resources to protect U.S. companies from the discriminatory effects of DSTs. It also supports appropriate tax and trade tools, including Section 301 investigations into the implementation or proposal of DSTs by any nation. (Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 authorizes the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to investigate and take action to enforce U.S. rights under trade agreements and respond to certain foreign trade practices.)

Plain-English rewrite of the Congressional Research Service summary published on Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed.

Subjects

Foreign Trade and International Finance

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1340 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1340 Expressing strong opposition to the imposition of digital services taxes and other relevant similar measures by other countries that unfairly discriminate against United States companies. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 4, 2026 Mr. Estes (for himself, Ms. DelBene, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Schneider) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing strong opposition to the imposition of digital services taxes and other relevant similar measures by other countries that unfairly discriminate against United States companies. Whereas a digital services tax (DST) or a relevant similar measure is a tax levied by a government on a company that provides a digital service to a person or company of that country; Whereas several countries have also proposed or implemented other measures that similarly discriminate against United States digital services providers that are novel and extraterritorial taxes like DSTs and pose significant challenges to United States companies; Whereas many companies that provide digital services are not physically located in the countries where the people that use the company's services reside and generate revenue from a global enterprise; Whereas, under current international income tax and trade agreements, the country where multinational companies have a permanent establishment are granted the primary right to tax the income rather than the country where their products are sold or used; Whereas the scope of DSTs are based on revenues unconnected to in-country presence and applied to gross revenue rather than income; Whereas certain countries have implemented DSTs that deviate from this international income tax system that are discriminatory to United States-based companies and threaten the success and competitiveness of United States companies and workers in these international markets; Whereas many countries, including France, Italy, Spain, Turkiye, Austria, and the United Kingdom, have already implemented a DST, and other countries, including Poland and Belgium, are actively considering enacting their own DSTs; Whereas the United States and more than 145 countries are continuing to engage in constructive dialogue related to the tax challenges of the digital economy, including global minimum taxes; Whereas, from 2019 to 2021, in response to the DSTs of France, Italy, Turkiye, Austria, Spain, and the United Kingdom, the United States Trade Representative published reports prepared in investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301); Whereas the reports made 5 main findings, including-- (1) these DSTs are intended to, and by their structure and operation do, discriminate against United States digital companies; (2) these DSTs' retroactive application is unusual and inconsistent with prevailing tax principles and renders the taxes particularly burdensome for covered United States companies, which will also affect their customers, including United States small businesses and consumers; (3) these DSTs' application to gross revenue rather than income contravenes prevailing tax principles and imposes significant additional burdens on covered United States companies; (4) these DSTs' application to revenues unconnected to a presence in- country contravenes prevailing international tax principles and is particularly burdensome for covered United States companies; and (5) these DSTs' application to a small group of digital companies contravenes international tax principles counseling against targeting the digital economy for special, unfavorable tax treatment; Whereas the United States Government has many options to combat DSTs,…
Show the remaining 375 wordsHide the remaining 375 words
including bilateral engagement, withdrawal of trade preference programs, World Trade Organization dispute settlement, or imposing duties, fees, import restrictions, or taxes on the goods or services of countries that unfairly target United States companies; Whereas the United States Trade Representative's use of Section 301 investigations on digital services taxes has proven to be useful tools in compelling foreign jurisdictions to negotiate fair, profit-based tax treatment; Whereas sustained United States trade engagement has already led to certain trading partners agreeing to withdraw or repeal existing DSTs or formally commit to not impose DSTs in the future; Whereas the United States will continue bilateral and multilateral engagement on DSTs, based on the principles of no double taxation, evidence-based taxation, net taxation over gross taxation, and legal certainty; and Whereas, even with ongoing negotiations, several jurisdictions continue to maintain or consider DSTs that specifically target the gross revenues of United States-based companies, creating a persistent environment of double taxation and market distortion: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) is committed to free and fair trade between the United States and other countries; (2) agrees with the findings of the reports issued by the United States Trade Representative that found DSTs discriminate against United States companies and violate existing international income tax and trade agreements; (3) supports the Office of the United States Trade Representative for initiating on June 5, 2020, investigations into discriminatory DSTs; (4) calls on all other countries to cease and desist from implementing any DST or similar measures, to repeal existing DSTs, and to immediately stop unfairly targeting United States companies; (5) calls on all countries to continue to work toward consensus with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to address the tax challenges of a global, digitalized economy based on the first principles of no double taxation, evidence-based taxation, net taxation over gross taxation, and legal certainty; (6) calls on the relevant United States Government agencies to use all appropriate and available methods and resources to protect United States companies from the discriminatory treatment and burdensome effects of DSTs; and (7) supports of the of appropriate tax and trade tools, including section 301 investigations into the implementation or proposal of digital service taxes by any nation. <all>
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HRES1152Expressing appreciation and recognition for the contributions of the American cowboy and historic cattle trails in advancing American history in celebration of the Nation's 250th anniversary.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-04-02
  • HR8101Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility Act (EBITDA)
    Referred to Committee · 2026-03-26
  • HCONRES76Recognizing the visionary leadership of Chief Richard LaMunyon and the profound global impact of the Law Enforcement Torch Run for Special Olympics.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-03-05
  • HR7520Efficiency Adjustment Delay Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-02-12