HouseH.Res. 1637119th Congress
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the pay disparity between disabled women and nondisabled men.
Full Text
Official text as published. Use Ctrl+F / Cmd+F to search within the document.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1637 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1637
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the pay disparity between
disabled women and nondisabled men.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 22, 2026
Ms. Simon (for herself, Ms. Pressley, and Ms. Randall) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education
and Workforce
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the pay disparity between
disabled women and nondisabled men.
Whereas more than 60 years after Congress enacted the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29
U.S.C. 206 note; Public Law 88-38), an analysis of 2024 data from the
Bureau of the Census shows that disabled women workers overall,
including those working part-time and seasonally, are paid an average of
56 cents for every dollar paid to nondisabled men, and among full-time,
year-round workers are paid 68 cents on the dollar;
Whereas an analysis of 2024 data from the Bureau of the Census shows that among
full-time, year-round workers--
(1) for every dollar paid to white, non-Hispanic, nondisabled men--
G (A) disabled Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander
women are paid 73 cents;
G (B) disabled white, non-Hispanic women are paid 64 cents;
G (C) disabled American Indian and Alaska Native women are paid 60
cents;
G (D) disabled multiracial women are paid 60 cents;
G (E) disabled Black women are paid 57 cents; and
G (F) disabled Latinas are paid 53 cents; and
(2) while disabled people overall experience a wage gap, disabled
women, particularly many disabled women of color, face especially large
gaps;
Whereas of the 6 types of disability assessed in the American Community Survey--
(1) disabled women workers face a wage gap compared to nondisabled men
regardless of type of disability; and
(2) disabled women workers, including those working part-time and
seasonally, who have difficulty with independent living experience the
largest wage gap, typically paid just 39 cents for every dollar paid to
nondisabled men in 2024;
Whereas among all workers, including those working part-time and seasonally,
disabled women veterans are paid an average of 66 cents for every dollar
paid to nondisabled veteran men in 2024;
Whereas the wage gap remains large for disabled women with more education, as
disabled women with a bachelor's degree working full-time, year-round in
2024 are typically paid $61,000 per year, just 66 percent of what
nondisabled men with the same educational attainment are typically paid,
and $4,000 less than nondisabled men with some college education or an
associate's degree;
Whereas of disabled workers who live in institutional group quarters, including
those working part-time or seasonally, disabled women are typically paid
just $11,500 per year and disabled men are paid $12,000 per year, while
nondisabled men are typically paid an average of $54,000 per year in
2024;
Whereas disabled women experience occupational segregation and are
overrepresented in low-paid health care, clerical, and social service
jobs;
Whereas segregated workplaces and the subminimum wage for disabled employees
stifle competitive integrated employment for disabled women;
Whereas many systemic barriers affect access to livable wages and employment
opportunities for disabled women, including--
(1) discrimination;
(2) public benefits work disincentives;
(3) broken health care infrastructure;
(4) increased employment-related costs;
(5) inadequate vocational rehabilitation services; and
(6) a lack of access to supported employment services; and
Whereas LGBTQI+ disabled people face additional barriers to employment, and more
inclusive data on LGBTQI+ disabled workers is needed to determine the
added impact of these barriers on wages and workforce participation,
particularly for trans and nonbinary disabled people who are often
excluded from data: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) recognizes the pay disparity between disabled women and
nondisabled men and the impact of that pay disparity on women,
families, and the United States; and
(2) reaffirms its commitment to supporting equal pay for
disabled women, narrowing the gender, disability, and racial
wage gaps and addressing the systemic barriers that drive those
inequities.
<all>