Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

S485Referred to Committee

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2025-02-06
Introduced
23
Cosponsors
S
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Rand Paul
Rand Paul
Republican · KY · Senator
Votes with party: 40.2% (316 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/P000603

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (23)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

  • Bernie Moreno (R-OH)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Chuck Grassley (R-IA)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Cynthia M. Lummis (R-WY)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Eric Schmitt (R-MO)Original· 2025-02-06
  • James E. Risch (R-ID)Original· 2025-02-06
  • James Lankford (R-OK)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Katie Boyd Britt (R-AL)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Kevin Cramer (R-ND)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Mike Crapo (R-ID)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Mike Lee (R-UT)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Mike Rounds (R-SD)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Rick Scott (R-FL)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Roger Marshall (R-KS)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Steve Daines (R-MT)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Ted Budd (R-NC)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Tim Sheehy (R-MT)Original· 2025-02-06
  • Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)Original· 2025-02-06
  • John R. Curtis (R-UT)· 2025-02-12
  • Todd Young (R-IN)· 2025-02-12
  • Jon Husted (R-OH)· 2025-03-26
  • John Barrasso (R-WY)· 2025-07-15
  • Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· 2026-04-15

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

2025-02-06

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Previously

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs CommitteeReferred To · 2025-02-06
  • Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsReferred To · 2025-02-06

Plain-English Summary

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025 This bill expands congressional review of federal agency rules and establishes additional procedures for major rules and agency guidance. Specifically, the bill requires the enactment of a joint resolution for a major rule to take effect. A major rule is a rule that has resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual economic effect of at least $100 million; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, or innovation. Additionally, major rules approved by a joint resolution under the bill expire, and are no longer effective, 10 years after the enactment of such joint resolution. Further, each agency must annually designate at least 10% of the agency’s major rules that are currently in effect for review and approval by a joint resolution of Congress. Such rules that are not approved shall no longer be in effect. Under the bill, agency guidance documents are considered rules and certain significant guidance documents are considered major rules. Significant guidance documents include guidance anticipated to lead to an annual effect of at least $100 million, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, the environment, public health, or state or local government. The Office of Management and Budget must establish an federal regulatory budget specifying the net amount of incremental regulatory costs allowed by the federal government for the next fiscal year.

Plain-English rewrite of the Congressional Research Service summary published on Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed.

Subjects

Government Operations and Politics
Full bill text is not yet cached locally.
Open text viewRead on Congress.gov

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • S4583Legalizing Premium Health Care Act of 2026
    Referred to Committee · 2026-05-20
  • S4486A bill to amend title 3, United States Code, to prescribe a process to authorize certain activities at the Executive Residence at the White House, and for other purposes.
    Introduced · 2026-05-12
  • SJRES189A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect United States citizenship.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-04-29
  • S4315Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-04-16