SenateS. 4894119th Congress

FUSE Act

Full Text

Official text as published. Use Ctrl+F / Cmd+F to search within the document.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4894 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4894

 To establish a pilot program on safety and qualification of printable 
            energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2026

  Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a pilot program on safety and qualification of printable 
            energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Feedstocks. Uniformity, Safety, and 
Energetics Act'' or the ``FUSE Act''.

SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM ON SAFETY AND QUALIFICATION OF PRINTABLE 
              ENERGETIC FEEDSTOCKS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall establish a 
pilot program, to be carried out by the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering, in coordination with the Capability Program 
Executive, Ammunition and Energetics (or successor organization) and 
appropriate service acquisition executives, to evaluate the safety, 
quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks 
for controlled additive manufacturing applications.
    (b) Purpose.--The purposes of the pilot program are--
            (1) to determine whether the use of printable energetic 
        feedstocks can improve handling safety, process stability, lot-
        to-lot consistency, and supply chain resilience relative to 
        traditional energetics manufacturing and handling methods;
            (2) to analyze logistics impact on throughput, waste, 
        defect rate, and constituent material availability versus 
        state-of-the-art legacy processes;
            (3) to develop and validate new test and evaluation 
        methods, if necessary, including metrology and digital quality 
        assurance, suitable for assessing printable energetic 
        feedstocks for Department of Defense use;
            (4) to assess applicability of printable energetic 
        feedstocks to existing or planned munition and energetics 
        modernization efforts, consistent with explosive safety, 
        security, and environmental requirements, that provide an 
        advantage in performance or logistics; and
            (5) to identify barriers to adoption, including 
        infrastructure, standards, certification, and workforce 
        requirements.
    (c) Activities.--Activities under the pilot program may include--
            (1) identification, assessment, and characterization of 
        representative printable energetic feedstocks and their 
        performance consistency under controlled conditions;
            (2) development of qualification criteria and data packages 
        to inform safety releases, waivers, or certifications as 
        appropriate;
            (3) limited demonstrations at Government facilities or 
        contractor facilities that meet all applicable explosive safety 
        and security requirements;
            (4) development of nonproprietary standards, metrology 
        approaches, and digital thread quality controls for printable 
        energetic feedstocks; and
            (5) analysis of operational impacts via wargaming or 
        mission/campaign modeling and experimental performance data.
    (d) Comparative Safety Assessment Required.--As a core element of 
the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comparative 
assessment of the safety of the use of printable energetic feedstocks 
relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling, 
including, at a minimum--
            (1) hazards and risks associated with storage, transport, 
        handling, and processing;
            (2) sensitivity and response to credible stimuli (including 
        thermal and mechanical stimuli) using appropriate test 
        standards;
            (3) process safety considerations, including potential 
        failure modes and mitigations for controlled additive 
        manufacturing workflows;
            (4) accident and incident risk modeling (including 
        qualitative and quantitative risk assessment where feasible); 
        and
            (5) recommended safety controls, facility requirements, and 
        operational constraints for any future operational use.
    (e) Safety and Security Requirements.--The Secretary of Defense 
shall ensure that activities under the pilot program--
            (1) are conducted only at facilities compliant with 
        applicable explosive safety siting, storage, handling, and 
        operating requirements;
            (2) incorporate counter-diversion safeguards, inventory 
        accountability, and chain-of-custody controls;
            (3) apply cybersecurity and access controls for any digital 
        manufacturing files, process parameters, and quality records; 
        and
            (4) do not authorize dissemination of restricted 
        manufacturing parameters outside approved Government and 
        cleared-industry channels.
    (f) Reporting.--Not later than 180 days after initiation of the 
pilot program, and annually thereafter for the duration of the pilot 
program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees (as that term is defined in section 101(a) of title 10, 
United States Code) a report that includes--
            (1) pilot objectives, participants, test locations, and 
        safety governance structure;
            (2) test methodologies, standards used, and key safety and 
        quality metrics;
            (3) results of activities conducted under subsection (c), 
        including identification, assessment, and characterization of 
        representative printable energetic feedstocks, demonstrations, 
        qualification criteria, data packages, and standard 
        development;
            (4) results of the comparative safety assessment required 
        under subsection (d), including identified hazards, 
        mitigations, and residual risk;
            (5) an assessment of cost, schedule, and scalability 
        relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling;
            (6) recommended qualification and certification pathways, 
        including any standards gaps; and
            (7) any recommended legislative, regulatory, or resourcing 
        actions required to enable safe adoption.
    (g) Duration.--The pilot program shall be carried out for not more 
than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this section.
                                 <all>