Supreme Court Ethics Act

Christopher Murphy

Democrat · CT · Senator

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

• Adam B. Schiff (D-CA)Original· 2026-07-23
• Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)Original· 2026-07-23
• Bernard Sanders (I-VT)Original· 2026-07-23
• Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)Original· 2026-07-23
• Edward J. Markey (D-MA)Original· 2026-07-23
• Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)Original· 2026-07-23
• John W. Hickenlooper (D-CO)Original· 2026-07-23
• Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D-NY)Original· 2026-07-23
• Martin Heinrich (D-NM)Original· 2026-07-23
• Peter Welch (D-VT)Original· 2026-07-23
• Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)Original· 2026-07-23
• Ron Wyden (D-OR)Original· 2026-07-23
• Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)Original· 2026-07-23
• Tina Smith (D-MN)Original· 2026-07-23

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

2026-07-23

Source: Congress.gov

The federal government would create a formal code of conduct that all judges and Supreme Court justices must follow, establish a new position called an Ethics Investigations Counsel to look into potential violations, and require judges to publicly explain when they remove themselves from cases due to conflicts of interest. These changes would apply to judges across all federal courts and aim to increase transparency and accountability in the judicial system.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 5121 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 5121 To amend chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct for justices and judges of the courts of the United States, establish an Ethics Investigations Counsel, and require disclosure of recusals. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 23, 2026 Mr. Murphy (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Hickenlooper, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Smith, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Welch, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Schiff, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct for justices and judges of the courts of the United States, establish an Ethics Investigations Counsel, and require disclosure of recusals. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Supreme Court Ethics Act''. SEC. 2. CODE OF CONDUCT. (a) In General.--Chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 964. Code of conduct ``(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall issue a code of conduct that-- ``(1) applies to each judge of the courts of the United States; and ``(2) at minimum, incorporates the requirements under section 455. ``(b) Supreme Court.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Supreme Court of the United States shall issue a code of conduct that-- ``(1) applies to each justice of the Supreme Court; and ``(2) at minimum, incorporates the requirements under section 455.''. (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``964. Code of conduct.''. SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF ETHICS INVESTIGATIONS COUNSEL AND REPORTING PROTOCOL. (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Supreme Court of the United States issues a code of conduct under section 964(b) of title 28, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, the Supreme Court of the United States shall appoint and fix the compensation of an Ethics Investigations Counsel who shall adopt rules providing for the enforcement of the code of conduct, including a process to receive from the public information about potential violations of the code of conduct by justices of the Supreme Court. (b) Term.--The Ethics Investigation Counsel shall serve for a renewable term of 4 years. (c) Removal.--The Ethics Investigation Counsel may be removed for cause by the Supreme Court of the United States. (d) Process.--The process adopted under subsection (a) shall include the establishment of methods for the submission of the information described in subsection (a) in electronic form and by mail. (e) Investigations.--The Ethics Investigations Counsel appointed under this section shall conduct investigations into potential violations of the code of conduct issued under section 964(b) of title 28, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, and other conduct prejudicial to the ethical, effective, and expeditious administration of the business of the Supreme Court of the United States. (f) Assistants.--The Ethics Investigations Counsel appointed under this section-- (1) may, with the approval of the Chief Justice of…

the United States, appoint necessary assistants and fix their compensation; and (2) may, at the discretion of the Ethics Investigations Counsel, retain the services of attorneys who are not employees of the Federal Government to assist in investigations conducted by the Ethics Investigations Counsel. (g) Report.--The Ethics Investigations Counsel appointed under this section shall issue an annual public report describing the information about potential violations of the code of conduct described in subsection (a) and any steps taken to investigate, resolve, or rehabilitate the conduct described in the information. SEC. 4. RECUSAL OF JUSTICES. (a) In General.--In any case in which a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States disqualifies himself or herself in a proceeding under section 455 of title 28, United States Code, the justice shall disclose in the public record of the proceeding the reasons for the disqualification. (b) Denial of Motion To Disqualify.--If a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States denies a motion brought by a party to a proceeding before the Court that the justice should be disqualified in the proceeding under section 455 of title 28, United States Code, the justice shall disclose in the public record of the proceeding the reasons for the denial of the motion. <all>

• S5531A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an excise tax on digital advertising, and for other purposes.
  Referred to Committee · 2026-09-24
• SRES899A resolution recognizing suicide as a serious public health problem and expressing support for the designation of September as "National Suicide Prevention Month".
  Referred to Committee · 2026-09-24
• S5470Protecting our Students in Schools Act of 2026
  Referred to Committee · 2026-09-23
• S5467MAGNET Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-09-23