HJRES25Enacted into Law
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Introduced
In Committee
Passed One Chamber
Passed Both
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2025-01-21
Introduced
9
Cosponsors
HJRES
ⓘType
Sponsor
Mike Carey
Republican · OH · Representative
Votes with party: 97.0% (601 recorded votes)
Full profile: /officials/C001126
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Cosponsors (9)
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
- Tom Emmer (R-MN-6)· 2025-01-28
- Warren Davidson (R-OH-8)· 2025-01-28
- Jeff Crank (R-CO-5)· 2025-02-04
- Claudia Tenney (R-NY-24)· 2025-02-07
- David Kustoff (R-TN-8)· 2025-02-24
- Shri Thanedar (D-MI-13)· 2025-02-24
- Zachary Nunn (R-IA-3)· 2025-02-24
- William R. Timmons IV (R-SC-4)· 2025-02-25
- Troy Downing (R-MT-2)· 2025-02-27
Latest Action
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Committee Activity
Currently in
- House Committee on Ways and MeansReported By · 2025-02-28
Previously
- House Committee on Ways and MeansMarkup By · 2025-02-26
- House Committee on Ways and MeansReferred To · 2025-01-21
Plain-English Summary
This joint resolution nullifies requirements for persons effectuating decentralized financial (DeFi) transactions to report certain information regarding digital asset sales to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the requirements included in the rule titled Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales and issued by the IRS on December 30, 2024. Decentralized finance refers to the suite of financial activities and services that are facilitated by cryptocurrency and intended to be conducted without any sort of reliance on traditional financial tools or intermediaries.
Plain-English rewrite of the Congressional Research Service summary published on Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed.
Affected Industries
Industries and interest groups with a stake in how this bill is resolved. Compare with each member's outside-money backers on their finance page.
Crypto & Digital Assets
Why this matters: Look up any member who voted on this bill and check their finance page — do the industries listed above match the groups funding their campaigns? That's the kind of connection this tool is built to help you find.
How Congress Voted
Roll Call #66
PassedParty-Line Vote2025-03-11 · HouseOn Ordering the Previous Question
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25); providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1156); providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1968); and for other purposes.
D: 0 Yes / 212 NoR: 216 Yes / 0 No
Total: 216 Yes / 212 No / 4 Not Voting
Follow the Money
$149K
to 426 YES voters
avg $351/member
$84K
to 422 NO voters
avg $199/member
YES voters received 1.8x more from Crypto & Digital Assets than NO voters. 422 YES voters had no recorded industry money.
Source: FEC filings. Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members receive money from many industries; these figures show only industries affected by this bill.
Sponsor's connection: Mike Carey (R-OH) has no recorded contributions from affected industries and voted Yes.
Top Industry-Funded “Yes” Voters (4)
Top Industry-Funded “No” Voters (2)
Broke With Party (3)
Committee Members Who Voted (834)
Full Vote Breakdown (426 members)
Yes (213)
No (210)
Not Voting / Present (3)
Roll Call #67
PassedParty-Line Vote2025-03-11 · HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25); providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1156); providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1968); and for other purposes.
D: 0 Yes / 213 NoR: 216 Yes / 1 No
Total: 216 Yes / 214 No / 2 Not Voting
Follow the Money
$149K
to 426 YES voters
avg $351/member
$84K
to 422 NO voters
avg $199/member
YES voters received 1.8x more from Crypto & Digital Assets than NO voters. 422 YES voters had no recorded industry money.
Source: FEC filings. Correlation between donations and votes does not prove causation. Members receive money from many industries; these figures show only industries affected by this bill.
Sponsor's connection: Mike Carey (R-OH) has no recorded contributions from affected industries and voted Yes.
Top Industry-Funded “Yes” Voters (4)
Top Industry-Funded “No” Voters (2)
Broke With Party (3)
Committee Members Who Voted (834)
Full Vote Breakdown (426 members)
Yes (213)
No (212)
Not Voting / Present (1)
Who Funded the Votes?
Campaign-finance totals by industry, sourced from FEC filings, joined to vote positions from Congress.gov.
Who Funded the Votes?
Total campaign dollars received by members voting Yes vs No, grouped by industry sector.
Voted Yes
$417Kacross 213 members
Conservative Groups$177K
42% of this group's total
Veterans$86K
21% of this group's total
Crypto & Digital Assets$75K
18% of this group's total
Finance & Banking$74K
18% of this group's total
Progressive Groups$6K
1% of this group's total
Voted No
$526Kacross 212 members
Conservative Groups$337K
64% of this group's total
Progressive Groups$87K
16% of this group's total
Crypto & Digital Assets$42K
8% of this group's total
Veterans$40K
8% of this group's total
LGBTQ+$20K
4% of this group's total
Subjects
Taxation
Full Bill Text
Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.J. Res. 25 Enrolled Bill (ENR)] H.J.Res.25 One Hundred Nineteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-five Joint Resolution Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ``Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales''. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ``Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales'' (89 Fed. Reg. 106928 (December 30, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
Related legislation
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.
- HR9573Housing Opportunities and Preservation Enhancement Act of 2026Referred to Committee · 2026-07-02
- HR9424Save Our Pedestrians Act of 2026Referred to Committee · 2026-06-24
- HR9398Historic Preservation and Land Conservation Certainty ActReferred to Committee · 2026-06-23
- HR9383Small Business and Consumer Credit Act of 2026Referred to Committee · 2026-06-22