Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics

Data Last Updated

Bills & Votes: 5 hours ago
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HR9331Referred to Committee

STOP Payments Fraud Act of 2026

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-06-18
Introduced
0
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Young Kim
Young Kim
Republican · CA · Representative
Votes with party: 97.8% (580 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/K000397

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (0)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

2026-06-18

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • House Committee on Financial ServicesReferred To · 2026-06-18

Plain-English Summary

Banks would be allowed to hold onto deposits longer when they suspect fraud involving checks or wire transfers, giving them more time to investigate before making the money available to customers. This change would modify existing rules that normally require banks to make deposited funds available quickly, creating an exception when there are signs of fraudulent activity. The measure affects both banks and their customers by balancing the need for fraud protection against the expectation of quick access to deposited money.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 9331 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9331 To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to provide exceptions in the case of fraudulent checks or wire transfers, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 18, 2026 Mrs. Kim introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to provide exceptions in the case of fraudulent checks or wire transfers, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Transaction Oversight and Preventing Payments Fraud Act of 2026'' or the ``STOP Payments Fraud Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. PARITY OF AVAILABILITY FOR CERTAIN CHECKS. The Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) is amended-- (a) in section 603 (12 U.S.C. 4002)-- (1) in subsection (a)(2)-- (A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (F); (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (E) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively; and (C) in subparagraph (C), as so redesignated, by adding ``and'' at the end; and (2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (1) and the heading to paragraph (2); and (b) in section 604(a)(1)(D), by striking ``subparagraph (A), (B), or (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A) or (B)''. SEC. 3. EXCEPTION TO FUNDS AVAILABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE CASE OF FRAUD. Section 604(c) of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4003(c)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), in the heading of the paragraph, by striking ``In general'' and inserting ``Collectability''; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: ``(2) Fraud.-- ``(A) Regulations.--In accordance with regulations which the Board, jointly with the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, shall prescribe, subsections (a)(2), (b), (c), and (e) of section 603 shall not apply with respect to any check deposited in an account at a depository institution if the receiving depository institution has reasonable suspicion to believe that the check is false, unauthorized, or otherwise involves fraud. For purposes of the preceding sentence, reasonable suspicion to believe that a check is false, unauthorized, or otherwise involves fraud requires the existence of indicators that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that the check involves fraud. Such reasons shall be included in the notice required under subsection (f). ``(B) Rule of application.--A receiving depository institution that has reasonable suspicion to believe that a check is false, unauthorized, or otherwise involves fraud, as described in subparagraph (A), may also have reasonable cause to believe that such check is uncollectible from the originating depository institution, as described in paragraph (1).''; and (4) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1) or (2)''. SEC. 4. EXCEPTION TO FUNDS AVAILABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE CASE OF NEW ACCOUNTS AND FRAUDULENT WIRE TRANSFERS. Section 604 of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4003) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(g) Application of Certain Exceptions in Circumstances With Greater Fraud Risk.--With respect to an account established at a depository institution, and without regard to whether the account was established by a new depositor, upon the occurrence of circumstances identified by rule by the Board, jointly with the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, as associated with greater fraud risk, the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a)…
Show the remaining 392 wordsHide the remaining 392 words
shall apply with respect to any deposit in such account for a period of time determined by rule by the Board, jointly with the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, but not to exceed 60 days for each such occurrence. ``(h) Reasonable Suspicion Exception for Wire Transfers.-- ``(1) In general.--In accordance with regulations which the Board, jointly with the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, shall prescribe, section 603(a)(1)(B) shall not apply with respect to funds received by a depository institution by wire transfer if the receiving depository institution has reasonable suspicion to believe that the wire transfer is false, unauthorized, or otherwise involves fraud. For purposes of the preceding sentence, reasonable suspicion to believe that a wire transfer is false, unauthorized, or otherwise involves fraud requires the existence of indicators that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that the wire transfer involves fraud. Such reasons shall be included in the notice required under subsection (f). ``(2) Basis for determination.--No determination under this subsection may be based on any class of wire transfers or persons. ``(3) Overdraft fees.--If the receiving depository institution determines that a wire transfer for credit to an account is a wire transfer described in paragraph (1), the receiving depository institution shall not assess any fee for any subsequent overdraft with respect to such account, if-- ``(A) the depositor was not provided with the written notice required under subsection (f) (with respect to such determination) at the time the wire transfer was delayed for credit; and ``(B) the overdraft would not have occurred but for the fact that the funds so transferred are not available. ``(4) Compliance.--Each agency referred to in section 610(a) shall monitor compliance with the requirements of this subsection in each regular examination of a depository institution. For the purpose of this paragraph, each depository institution shall retain a record of each notice provided under subsection (f) as a result of the application of this subsection. ``(i) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed to restrict or prohibit a depository institution involved with a deposit by check or wire transfer from communicating to any other depository institution also involved with the deposit that a depository institution has invoked an exception under this section to some or all of the requirements of section 603 with respect to the deposit.''. <all>
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HR9434To amend the Federal securities laws to require rulemakings to consider the cumulative effects of the rule with certain other final and proposed rules.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-06-24
  • HR7037Developing Overseas Mineral Investments and New Allied Networks for Critical Energies Act
    Passed House · 2026-06-09
  • HR5248PROFIT Act of 2026
    Passed House · 2026-06-09
  • HR9062BOOST American Business Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-05-29