HR9688Referred to Committee

High Court Gift Ban Act

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-07-14
Introduced
41
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Jamie Raskin
Jamie Raskin
Democrat · MD · Representative
Votes with party: 98.6% (635 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/R000606

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (41)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

2026-07-14

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

Plain-English Summary

Federal judges would be banned from accepting gifts worth more than $50 at a time or $100 total per year from any source, with some exceptions allowed. The rule aims to prevent judges from being influenced by gifts that could create conflicts of interest or the appearance of impropriety. This would apply to all federal judges and help maintain public trust in the impartiality of the courts.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

Subjects

Law

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

119 HR 9688 IH: High Court Gift Ban Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-07-14 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 9688IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 14, 2026Mr. Raskin (for himself, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Balint, Mr. Carson, Ms. Budzinski, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Correa, Ms. Crockett, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Foushee, Mr. Frost, Mr. García of Illinois, Mr. Garcia of California, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Lieu, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Norton, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Quigley, Ms. Ross, Ms. Sánchez, Ms. Scanlon, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Stansbury, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Torres of New York, Ms. Williams of Georgia, and Mr. Casar) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo prohibit Federal judges from receiving gifts valued over $50 in an instance or $100 in the aggregate in a year from a source unless excepted, and for other purposes. 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the High Court Gift Ban Act. 2.Prohibition on giftsSubchapter V of chapter 73 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 7354.Gifts to Federal judges (a)In general (1)ProhibitionA judicial officer may not accept a gift from any source unless— (A)the judicial officer reasonably and in good faith believes the gift has a value of less than $50; and (B)the aggregate value of gifts the judicial officer has received from the source in that calendar year is $100 or less, inclusive of the present gift. (2)ExceptionsThe prohibition under paragraph (1) does not apply to any of the following circumstances: (A)Anything for which the judicial officer pays the fair market value. (B)Anything for which the judicial officer does not use and promptly returns to the person who provided the gift to the judicial officer. (C)A gift from a relative. (D)A gift from another judicial officer. (E)Honorary degrees (and associated travel, food, refreshments, and entertainment) and other bona fide, nonmonetary awards presented in recognition of public service (and associated food, refreshments, and entertainment provided in the presentation of such degrees and awards) paid for by an educational institution so long as only the educational institution pays for, or sponsors, the award and invites the judicial officer. (F)Opportunities and benefits that are— (i)available to the public or to a class consisting of all Federal employees; (ii)offered to members of a group or class for which membership in such group or class is unrelated to service as a judicial officer; (iii)offered to members of an organization open to all judicial officers; (iv)in the form of loans from banks and other financial institutions on terms generally available to the public; or (v)in the form of a reduction in membership fees or fees for participation in activities of an organization if such reduction is offered to all Federal employees and such organization is a professional organization in which its membership is solely contingent on professional qualifications of the prospective member. (G)Reimbursement for reasonable expenses for transportation, food, lodging, and entertainment at a seminar or event relating to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice so long as— (i)the judicial officer was not invited to the seminar or event by a prohibited source; (ii)the seminar or event is not organized, paid for, or sponsored by a prohibited source; and (iii)the total…
Show the remaining 622 words
amount of reimbursement for the seminar or event is— (I)$2,000 or less; or (II)greater than $2,000 if such judicial officer received a written waiver from the Chief Justice of the United States (in the case of a justice) or the chief judge of the circuit or district of such officer (in the case of a judge). (H)Personal hospitality from an individual, who is not a prohibited source, in an amount that does not exceed the dollar amount established under paragraph (1) of section 2503(b)(as adjusted under paragraph (2) of such section) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 2503(b)) with respect to such calendar year. (3)Gifts to relativesA gift to a relative of the judicial officer shall be considered a gift to the judicial officer if— (A)it is given with the knowledge and acquiescence of the judicial officer; and (B)the judicial officer has reason to believe the gift was given because of the official position of the judicial officer. (b)Enforcement (1)Referral (A)Attorney GeneralThe Judicial Conference, or any official designated by the Supreme Court or Congress to assist the justices in maintaining compliance with the Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States issued by the Court on November 13, 2023, or any successor rules or regulations governing ethical or conduct standards for justices, shall refer to the Attorney General the name of any individual who the Conference or the official has reasonable cause to believe has accepted a gift prohibited by this section or any other law or regulation. (B)Notification of referralWhenever the Judicial Conference refers a judicial officer to the Attorney General under this subsection, the Conference shall notify the judicial council of the circuit in which such referred judicial officer serves. (2)Penalties (A)Civil penaltiesThe Attorney General may bring a civil action in any appropriate United States district court for a violation of this section, the penalties for which shall be the same as the penalties for violating section 13104 which are described in section 13106. (B)Criminal penaltiesIn the case of any knowing and willful violation of this subsection, the criminal penalties set forth in section 13106(a)(2) shall apply. (e)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)GiftThe term gift means any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value (including services, transportation, local travel, lodgings, and meals) whether provided in-kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. (2)Judicial officerThe term judicial officer has the meaning given that term in section 13101. (3)Personal hospitality from an individualThe term personal hospitality from an individual means hospitality extended— (A)by an individual for a nonbusiness purpose; (B)at the personal residence, property, or facilities owned by the individual or the individual’s family; (C)without payment or reimbursement from any other person (except the judicial officer or a relative of the judicial officer) for such hospitality; and (D)with the individual or the individual’s family present on the property at the time in which a judicial officer is being hosted. (4)Prohibited sourceThe term prohibited source means any person— (A)who has, or is likely to, come before the judicial officer; or (B)whose interests have, or are likely to, come before the judicial officer. (5)RelativeThe term relative has the meaning given that term in section 13101. (f) Implementation Within 180 days of the enactment of the, the Supreme Court of the United States and the Judicial Conference of the United States shall each promulgate regulations to carry out this section and ensure compliance. (g)Rule of constructionNothing in this section shall be construed to make it permissible for a judicial officer to accept a gift or other item of value that the judicial officer is prohibited from accepting under any other law, rule, or regulation..
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.