<span class ="kicker">Opening statement of Co-Chairman Smith at hearing on Venezuela</span>Human Rights in Venezuela: Status and Opportunity

This press release from Representative Christopher H. Smith (R-NJ) was published on 2026-07-15 and titled "<span class ="kicker">Opening statement of Co-Chairman Smith at hearing on Venezuela</span>Human Rights in V".

<span class ="kicker">Opening statement of Co-Chairman Smith at hearing on Venezuela</span>Human Rights in Venezuela: Status and Opportunity

Andrés Martínez-Fernández, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, testifies at the July 15 th hearing: “Particularly strong polling conducted through 1,000 face-to-face interviews in of this year showed that 72% of Venezuelans felt the country was moving in a positive direction, 92% of Venezuelans were grateful to President Trump for the removal of Nicolas Maduro and 90% supported the U.S. becoming Venezuela’s primary ally . ” The following are excerpts of Co-Chairman Chris Smith’s (R-NJ) opening statement at the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission’s July 15 th hearing, entitled “Human Rights in Venezuela: Status and Opportunity”: For more than a quarter century, Venezuela has endured one of the gravest humanitarian and human rights crises in the history of our hemisphere. Many thousands have been killed by the Chavez-Maduro dictatorships: the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights documented almost 7,000 extrajudicial killings in 2018 and 2019 alone. Thousands have been tortured and imprisoned. Millions have fled—nearly 8 million displaced. Families have been torn apart by repression, violence, and economic collapse. These horrors were driven by the Chavez, and since 2013, Maduro dictatorships, which, of course, had close political, ideological and military-intelligence partnerships with Cuba. Chavez liked to call Castro his mentor and father figure, and for Maduro, likewise, Castro was “father,” “teacher,” and “comandante.” As in Cuba, in Venezuela, a country rich in resources and educated, hard-working people was reduced to an impoverished dictatorship by socialists, who came to power under the slogan of “more democracy”—which, in practice, meant zero democracy . This year marked a dramatic turning point . In January, Nicolás Maduro was arrested by U.S. forces, removed from power, and brought to the United States to face justice. Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assumed acting leadership. Yet whether this leads to genuine democratic recovery—or merely another chapter of struggle—remains an open question. It has not yet happened. Some prisoners have been released—but there are still many political prisoners. Whether Venezuela will become free and democratic depends on Venezuelans. Before the arrest of Maduro, our government tried to promote freedom through various approaches—diplomacy, pressure, sanctions. None were successful. As the country navigates this transition, our goal must remain supporting conditions for Venezuelans themselves to restore accountable government, independent institutions, and economic opportunity. History shows that durable reform cannot be imposed from outside—but the U.S. can do much to help. Today, with a government in place with whom the Administration has a working relationship, we can engage with them in support of stabilization and recovery, and of course, we press for concrete reforms: dismantling repressive structures, ensuring political prisoners are fully freed without restrictions, advancing credible elections, and combating corruption and transnational crime. Effective humanitarian response to the earthquakes—coordinating with faith-based groups, and local communities—demonstrates how partnership can save lives, while respecting sovereignty. We also need to learn from the errors of the Obama and Biden administrations, who attempted to impose narrow agendas on foreign countries by funding and empowering elite western NGOs – which were often resented by host countries. I’m confident the Trump Administration has learned the lesson of that mistake. And that we will provide international support more wisely—humanitarian relief, technical assistance, anti-corruption efforts, and election assistance, in which the U.S. government remains engaged, reins in elite NGO agendas, and focuses on supporting fair processes in Venezuela without privileging any parties or seeking to impose results. I thank our witnesses and look forward to their testimony on the current status and the path forward. ###