Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

Press ReleaseNeutral2026-05-05

Fighting for SC Farmers Always

Ralph Norman
Ralph Norman
RSC-5 · Representative
Share:
EnvironmentAgriculture

Context

This press release from Representative Ralph Norman (R-SC) was published on 2026-05-05 and titled "Fighting for SC Farmers Always". It focuses on the environment and touches on agriculture.

Full Text

Fighting for SC Farmers Always

I have always maintained an open-door policy and regularly meet with any and all Americans, but my votes are grounded in facts and what’s best for folks in South Carolina’s 5th District. I opposed Rep. Luna’s Farm bill amendment because it welcomed an unworkable patchwork of conflicting state labeling requirements. That kind of uncertainty drives up costs and makes it harder for farmers to do their jobs and for families to put food on their table. For example, a South Carolina farmer growing soybeans could be required to follow one set of pesticide labeling rules at home, but face entirely different, and potentially conflicting, requirements if they sell or ship their crops across state lines. A product approved and properly labeled under federal standards could suddenly be treated as non-compliant in another state, exposing farmers to legal risk or forcing them to change practices mid-season. To be clear: the underlying language does not create a liability shield for pesticide manufacturers, and bad actors can still be held liable and penalized. My vote was about maintaining regulatory certainty and ensuring farmers have clear, uniform guidance while the EPA continues to oversee safety and protect public health. South Carolina already has strong safeguards in place. I’ll keep fighting to make sure our farmers have the tools they need to keep food safe, affordable, and available.
View original source →