Press ReleaseNeutral2025-12-18

Maloy, Lummis Introduce CLEAR Act to Protect Local and State Law Enforcement Authority

TaxesForeign PolicyCrime & JusticeAgriculture

Context

This press release from Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) was published on 2025-12-18 and titled "Maloy, Lummis Introduce CLEAR Act to Protect Local and State Law Enforcement Authority". It focuses on taxes and touches on foreign policy, crime and justice.

Full Text

Maloy, Lummis Introduce CLEAR Act to Protect Local and State Law Enforcement Authority

Earlier this week, Congresswoman Celeste Maloy (R-UT), alongside Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), introduced the Community Law Enforcement Authority Restoration Act of 2025 , known as the CLEAR Act , to block a Biden-era U.S. Forest Service rule that expands federal involvement in enforcing state and local laws. The Forest Service rule, Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions , was finalized in the final weeks of the Biden Administration and would allow federal land management agencies to administer and enforce certain criminal laws. The CLEAR Act prevents the Forest Service from administering, implementing, or enforcing the rule. “In Utah, local law enforcement knows their communities best,” said Congresswoman Maloy. “Our sheriffs are accountable to the people they serve. The CLEAR Act keeps law enforcement authority where it belongs and prevents unnecessary federal overreach into Utah’s rural counties.” Utah is home to vast areas of federally managed land, making clear lines of law enforcement authority critical for public safety and effective governance. Local sheriffs have long worked cooperatively with federal agencies, but the rule raised concerns about jurisdictional confusion and authority being expanded through administrative action rather than by Congress. “This effort, implemented by the U.S. Forest Service, has been a long-standing issue of contention,” said Tracy Glover, Sheriff of Kane County Utah . “While we seek strong working relationships with federal agencies, we cannot, and will not, abdicate our authority and jurisdiction to the detriment of the people we serve and the Office of Sheriff.” The bill is supported by the Western States Sheriffs’ Association , which represents more than 1,200 sheriffs across the West and has opposed the rule since it was first proposed.

View original source →

Maloy, Lummis Introduce CLEAR Act to Protect Local and State Law Enforcement Authority Earlier this week, Congresswoman Celeste Maloy (R-UT), alongside Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), introduced the Community Law Enforcement Authority Restoration Act of 2025 , known as the CLEAR Act , to block a Biden-era U.S. Forest Service rule that expands federal involvement in enforcing state and local laws. The Forest Service rule, Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions , was finalized in the final weeks of the Biden Administration and would allow federal land management agencies to administer and enforce certain criminal laws. The CLEAR Act prevents the Forest Service from administering, implementing, or enforcing the rule. “In Utah, local law enforcement knows their communities best,” said Congresswoman Maloy. “Our sheriffs are accountable to the people they serve. The CLEAR Act keeps law enforcement authority where it belongs and prevents unnecessary federal overreach into Utah’s rural counties.” Utah is home to vast areas of federally managed land, making clear lines of law enforcement authority critical for public safety and effective governance. Local sheriffs have long worked cooperatively with federal agencies, but the rule raised concerns about jurisdictional confusion and authority being expanded through administrative action rather than by Congress. “This effort, implemented by the U.S. Forest Service, has been a long-standing issue of contention,” said Tracy Glover, Sheriff of Kane County Utah . “While we seek strong working relationships with federal agencies, we cannot, and will not, abdicate our authority and jurisdiction to the detriment of the people we serve and the Office of Sheriff.” The bill is supported by the Western States Sheriffs’ Association , which represents more than 1,200 sheriffs across the West and has opposed the rule since it was first proposed.