Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics

Data Last Updated

Bills & Votes: 5 hours ago
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HR10011Referred to Committee

No PREJUDICE Act

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-07-30
Introduced
0
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Democrat · FL · Representative
Votes with party: 97.1% (660 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/W000797

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (0)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

2026-07-31

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • House Committee on Homeland SecurityReferred To · 2026-07-30
  • House Committee on the JudiciaryReferred To · 2026-07-30

Plain-English Summary

The proposal would ban the Department of Homeland Security from using federal money to conduct profiling based on characteristics like race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin when enforcing immigration and security laws. This would affect how DHS agents conduct investigations, searches, and enforcement actions, requiring them to base decisions on individual behavior and evidence rather than demographic characteristics. The measure is currently under review by congressional committees to determine its final form.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

Subjects

Immigration

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 10011 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 10011 To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 30, 2026 Ms. Wasserman Schultz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``No Person's Race, Ethnicity, Job, or Use of Dialect or Inflection is Cause for Enforcement Act'' or the ``No PREJUDICE Act''. SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATORY PROFILING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (a) Limitation on Use of Federal Funds.--No officer or employee of the Department of Homeland Security, or a person acting under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security, may seize, detain, or arrest an individual, or subject an individual to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities on the basis of any of the following, or any combination thereof: (1) The actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or ethnicity of the individual. (2) The presence of that individual at a location associated with the recruitment or transportation of individuals for informal or temporary employment, including bus stops, car washes, or agricultural sites. (3) Participation by that individual in a particular hobby, leisure activity, job, or career. (4) The use of Spanish or any language other than English, or the use of English with an accent, by that individual. (b) Immigration Proceedings.-- (1) Request for hearing.--An alien who in removal proceedings under the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)) may request a hearing in the appropriate district court of the United States to determine whether the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien. (2) Dismissal.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall dismiss the removal proceedings against the alien. (3) Remand.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was not violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall remand the case to the immigration court for further removal proceedings. <all>
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HR10749RAISE Act of 2026
    Referred to Committee · 2026-10-05
  • HR10068PROTECT Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-08-06
  • HR10010Build Homes, Not Hate Act of 2026
    Referred to Committee · 2026-07-30
  • HR4541To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.
    Passed House · 2026-07-27