CHARTER Act
Sponsor

Full profile: /officials/D000216
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Cosponsors (17)
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
- Adelita S. Grijalva (D-AZ-7)Original· 2026-04-30
- Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)Original· 2026-04-30
- Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL-9)Original· 2026-04-30
- Jesús G. "Chuy" García (D-IL-4)Original· 2026-04-30
- Kathy Castor (D-FL-14)Original· 2026-04-30
- Lateefah Simon (D-CA-12)Original· 2026-04-30
- Mark Takano (D-CA-39)Original· 2026-04-30
- Mike Quigley (D-IL-5)Original· 2026-04-30
- Pramila Jayapal (D-WA-7)Original· 2026-04-30
- Rashida Tlaib (D-MI-12)Original· 2026-04-30
- Sharice Davids (D-KS-3)Original· 2026-04-30
- Shri Thanedar (D-MI-13)Original· 2026-04-30
- Summer L. Lee (D-PA-12)Original· 2026-04-30
- Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR-1)Original· 2026-04-30
- Maxwell Frost (D-FL-10)· 2026-05-12
- Melanie A. Stansbury (D-NM-1)· 2026-05-12
Latest Action
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Committee Activity
Currently in
- House Committee on Education and WorkforceReferred To · 2026-04-30
Previously
- Education and Workforce CommitteeReferred To · 2026-04-30
Plain-English Summary
This bill would prevent charter schools from receiving federal education funding if they hire for-profit companies to run or manage their operations, requiring them to be operated by nonprofit organizations instead. The change would affect charter schools and the for-profit management companies that currently contract with them, potentially forcing schools to restructure their management or lose access to federal dollars for education programs and special education services. The goal is to ensure that federal education money goes directly to nonprofit educational organizations rather than for-profit businesses.
AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.
Subjects
Full Bill Text
Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8606 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8606 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure no funds made available under such Acts may be awarded to a charter school or charter management organization that enters into a contract with a for-profit entity for operating, overseeing, or managing the charter school, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2026 Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Ms. Bonamici, Mrs. Grijalva, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Quigley, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Simon, Mr. Takano, Mr. Thanedar, and Ms. Tlaib) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure no funds made available under such Acts may be awarded to a charter school or charter management organization that enters into a contract with a for-profit entity for operating, overseeing, or managing the charter school, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Championing Honest And Responsible Transparency in Education Reform Act'' or the ``CHARTER Act''. SEC. 2. PURPOSE AND FINDINGS. (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to ensure that each charter school that receives funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) (in this section referred to as the ``ESEA'') or the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) (in this section referred to as the ``IDEA'')-- (1) complies with the intent of the requirements for funding under such Act; and (2) best serves the educational needs of students by prohibiting such charter school and its charter management organization from entering into a contract with a for-profit entity under which the for-profit entity-- (A) operates, oversees, or manages the charter school in order to exert influence in school management; and (B) receives a portion of school revenue in order to extract profit for itself or its related entities. (b) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) An ``elementary school'' is defined as ``a nonprofit institutional day or residential school, including a public elementary charter school, that provides elementary education, as determined under State law'' under section 8101 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7801) and section 602 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1401). (2) A ``secondary school'' is defined as ``a nonprofit institutional day or residential school, including a public secondary charter school, that provides secondary education, as determined under State law, except that the term does not include any education beyond grade 12'' under section 8101 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7801) and section 602 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1401). (3) The term ``nonprofit'' as applied to a school, agency, organization, or institution means ``a school, agency, organization, or institution owned and operated by 1 or more nonprofit corporations or associations no part of the net earnings of which inures, or may lawfully inure, to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual'' under section 602 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1401). (4) In 2003, the Department of Education Office of Inspector General, upon auditing the Arizona Department of Education, concluded that the State educational agency in Arizona had improperly distributed funds under the ESEA…
Show the remaining 511 wordsHide the remaining 511 words
and the IDEA to for-profit charter schools. (5) In 2006, the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Court in Arizona State Bd. v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., 464 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2006) found that the terms ``elementary school'' and ``secondary school'' in the ESEA and the IDEA were limited to nonprofit entities, holding that for-profit charter schools were ineligible for Federal funds under the ESEA and the IDEA. (6) In response to the decision in Arizona State Bd. v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., the appellant for-profit charter schools reorganized as for-profit operators of nonprofit organizations, enabling the appellants to continue to receive Federal funds under the ESEA and the IDEA. (7) Every student in a publicly funded school in the United States, including charter school students, is entitled to access education services without having publicly funded resources depleted due to profit extraction. (8) Every taxpayer in the United States should be confident that public funds are responsibly stewarded and not funding the enrichment of for-profit charter operators at the expense of students and taxpayers. SEC. 3. ESEA DEFINITION OF CHARTER SCHOOL. (a) Prohibition of Contracting With For-Profit Entity for Essential Services.--Section 4310(2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7221i(2)) is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (L), by striking ``and'' at the end; (2) in subparagraph (M)-- (A) by moving the margins of such paragraph 2 ems to the left; and (B) by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(N) does not enter into a contract with a for- profit entity, or have a charter management organization or other nonprofit entity enter into such a contract on behalf of such school, under which the for-profit entity operates, oversees, manages, or otherwise carries out the administration of such school, which may include curriculum development, budget management, and faculty management (such as hiring, terminating, or supervising school-level staff); and ``(O) may enter into a contract with a for-profit or nonprofit entity for the provision of-- ``(i) food, payroll, facilities maintenance, or transportation services; ``(ii) classroom supplies (such as textbooks); or ``(iii) ancillary services or supplies.''. (b) General Definitions.--Section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(53) Charter school.--The term `charter school' has the meaning given the term in section 4310.''. SEC. 4. IDEA DEFINITION OF CHARTER SCHOOL. Section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(37) Charter school.--The term `charter school' has the meaning given the term in section 4310 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7221i).''. SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY. The amendments made by this Act-- (1) shall take effect on the date that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) shall only apply with respect to any contract entered into, renewed, or extended on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. <all>
Related legislation
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.
- HR4647Captain Paul W. Bud Bucha VA Medical Center Act of 2025Passed House · 2026-07-16
- HR9458Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery ActReferred to Committee · 2026-06-25
- HR9347CHILD Labor ActReferred to Committee · 2026-06-18
- HR9015Physician Education for Fistula Treatment ActReferred to Committee · 2026-05-22