To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act does not include any evidence that the court determines is not the product of reliable scientific principles and methods.
Sponsor

Full profile: /officials/H001096
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Cosponsors (0)
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.
Latest Action
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Committee Activity
Currently in
- House Committee on the JudiciaryReferred To · 2026-06-11
Plain-English Summary
This bill would change how federal courts review government agency decisions by allowing judges to exclude scientific evidence they believe doesn't come from reliable scientific methods. The change would affect anyone challenging government actions in court, including businesses, environmental groups, and individuals, by potentially making it harder to use certain studies or data to support their legal arguments. Courts would have more power to decide which scientific evidence is trustworthy enough to consider when reviewing whether an agency followed proper procedures.
AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.
Subjects
Full Bill Text
Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 9277 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9277 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act does not include any evidence that the court determines is not the product of reliable scientific principles and methods. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 11, 2026 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act does not include any evidence that the court determines is not the product of reliable scientific principles and methods. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. EVIDENCE DERIVED FROM RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND METHODS. Section 706(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (E) by striking ``or'' at the end; (2) in subparagraph (F) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; or''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(G) supported by evidence that the court determines is not the product of reliable scientific principles and methods, or that does not reflect a reliable application of those principles and methods.''. <all>
Related legislation
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.
- HR10673Battery Safety Placarding ActReferred to Committee · 2026-10-01
- HR677EARAPassed House · 2026-09-30
- HR10558CLEAR ActReferred to Committee · 2026-09-24
- HRES1535Supporting the designation of the week of September 13 through September 19, 2026, as "National Truck Driver Appreciation Week".Referred to Committee · 2026-09-14