Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

Presidents/Joseph R. Biden Jr./Executive Order
Executive Order14126✗ Potential Overreach

Executive Order 14126—Investing in America and Investing in American Workers

Issued 2024-09-06 by Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Plain-English Overview

AI-generated summary explaining what this action does, who it affects, and why it matters

Executive Order 14126, signed on September 6, 2024, directs federal agencies to prioritize projects that use federally funded infrastructure investments to create fair competition, economic stability, and good-paying jobs for American workers. The order focuses on ensuring that recipients of federal investment under major Biden-era legislation — including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act — deliver high labor standards, support domestic manufacturing, and provide stable employment conditions. It appears to direct attention to how federal funding conditions interact with project labor agreements and workforce development.

This executive order affects federal agencies that administer infrastructure and economic investment grants and loans, as well as the contractors, unions, and workers involved in federally assisted projects. American workers in construction, manufacturing, and clean energy sectors are among those most directly affected. It also affects state and local governments that receive federal funds and must comply with the conditions those funds carry.

The constitutional basis for this order draws on the President's authority to set conditions on how federal spending is administered, which courts have generally upheld. However, because the order touches on how congressionally appropriated funds are managed and potentially conditions spending in ways Congress did not explicitly mandate, some provisions could attract legal scrutiny under the Impoundment Control Act or the nondelegation doctrine, depending on how agencies implement it.

AI-generated summary for educational purposes

Constitutional Analysis

How this action fits (or doesn't) within Article II authority and existing law

Executive Order 14126 ("Investing in America and Investing in American Workers") involves withholding, pausing, or freezing federal funds. The President's stated reasoning: "fair competition, stability, and efficiency on federally assisted projects." This directly implicates the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which was passed specifically to prevent presidents from refusing to spend money Congress has appropriated. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive "power of the purse."

When Congress passes an appropriations bill and the President signs it into law, the executive branch is legally obligated to spend those funds for their designated purpose. Courts have consistently held that policy disagreements do not give the President authority to unilaterally withhold congressionally appropriated money. This type of action frequently prompts litigation and has been struck down by federal courts.

Official Summary

DCPD202400751 * {margin:0; padding:0; text-indent:0; } .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } h1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } .p, p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; margin:0pt; } .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; } li {display: block; } #l1 {padding-left: 0pt;counter-reset: c1 1; } #l1> li>*:first-child:before {counter-increment: c1; content: "("counter(c1, lower-latin)") "; color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } #l1> li:first-child>*:first-child:before {counter-increment: c1 0; } li {display: block; } #l2 {padding-left: 0pt;counter-reset: d1 1; } #l2> li>*:first-child:before {counter-increment: d1; content: "("counter(d1, lower-latin)") "; color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } #l2> li:first-child>*:first-child:before {counte

Read the official documentOpen on GovInfo →