Statement on Signing the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023
Issued 2023-03-20 by Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Plain-English Overview
AI-generated summary explaining what this action does, who it affects, and why it matters
This signing statement accompanies President Biden's signing of the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023 into law on March 20, 2023. The Act directs the Director of National Intelligence to declassify information related to the origins of COVID-19, including any intelligence relevant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The signing statement expresses Biden's support for transparency while raising concerns about provisions that could require the disclosure of information that might harm national security or intelligence sources and methods.
The law and signing statement affect the intelligence community, which must review and declassify the covered information, as well as the public and Congress, who are the intended beneficiaries of greater transparency. The Act reflects bipartisan congressional interest in understanding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the possibility that it may have originated from a laboratory accident.
Signing statements are constitutionally contested. While presidents use them to record interpretive views on legislation, statements suggesting intent to resist full compliance with a disclosure law raise separation-of-powers concerns. The administration's invocation of national security exemptions reflects the ongoing tension between the legislature's interest in transparency and the executive's interest in protecting intelligence sources and methods.
AI-generated summary for educational purposes
Constitutional Analysis
How this action fits (or doesn't) within Article II authority and existing law
This signing statement ("Statement on Signing the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023") was issued alongside a bill the President signed into law. The President's stated concerns: "against the disclosure of information that would harm national security." Signing statements allow presidents to express constitutional or policy objections to specific provisions of legislation they have just signed. Their legal weight and constitutional propriety have been contested since the practice became common in the 1980s.
Critics — including the American Bar Association — argue that using signing statements to announce an intent to not enforce portions of a law effectively creates a line-item veto, which the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York (1998). Defenders argue presidents have a duty to identify constitutional concerns and that signing statements are a legitimate form of executive interpretation. The constitutional propriety depends on whether this specific statement announces non-enforcement or merely records the President's views.
Official Summary
DCPD202300208 * {margin:0; padding:0; text-indent:0; } .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } h1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } .p, p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; margin:0pt; } .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; } .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } .s5 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2023 Statement on Signing the COVID–19 Origin Act of 2023 March 20, 2023 Today, I am pleased to sign into law S. 619