Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

Gary C. Peters

Gary C. Peters

DDemocratMI · Senator
61
/ 100
Average
Attendance99
Avg: 98
Independence42
Avg: 55
Bipartisan Tone8
Avg: 15
Ethics Record100
Avg: 100
Transparency44
Avg: 47

Accountability Score — composite of attendance, independence, bipartisan tone, ethics record & transparency.

Methodology
OverviewStatementsBillsFinanceVotesElections
3
Wins
0
Losses
3
Races

2020

Senate · MI
Won
DGary C. PetersWinner
2,734,568 votes49.9%
RJohn James
2,642,233 votes48.2%
UValerie Willis
50,597 votes0.9%
GMarcia Squier
39,217 votes0.7%
NDoug Dern
13,093 votes0.2%
WLeonard Paul Gadzinski
7 votes0.0%
WRobert William Carr
5 votes0.0%
Margin of victory: +1.7%

In the 2020 Senate race for MI Senate seat, Gary C. Peters (D) won with 49.9% of the vote, defeating John James (R) who received 48.2%. 5 additional candidates split the remaining vote. The 1.7-point margin made this one of the more competitive races of the cycle.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Debbie Stabenow (D) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2020 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. Given the narrow margin, this seat is likely to remain competitive and attract heavy investment in the next cycle.

2014

Senate · MI
Won
DGary C. PetersWinner
1,704,936 votes54.6%
RTerri Lynn Land
1,290,199 votes41.3%
LJim Fulner
62,897 votes2.0%
uRichard A. Matkin
37,529 votes1.2%
GChris Wahmhoff
26,137 votes0.8%

In the 2014 Senate race for MI Senate seat, Gary C. Peters (D) won with 54.6% of the vote, defeating Terri Lynn Land (R) who received 41.3%. 3 additional candidates split the remaining vote. Gary C. Peters's 13.3-point lead over the runner-up showed solid but not overwhelming support.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Debbie Stabenow (D) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. As a Democrat, Gary C. Peters won despite the historical midterm penalty against the president's party (Democrat Obama was in office).

2012

House · MI-14
Won
DGary C. PetersWinner
270,450 votes82.3%
RJohn Hauler
51,395 votes15.6%
LLeonard Schwartz
3,968 votes1.2%
GDouglas Campbell
2,979 votes0.9%

In the 2012 House race for MI-14, Gary C. Peters (D) won with 82.3% of the vote, defeating John Hauler (R) who received 15.6%. 2 additional candidates split the remaining vote. Gary C. Peters's 66.6-point advantage over the runner-up confirmed a comfortable win.

This was an open-seat race. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2012 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.