Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

Pete Sessions

Pete Sessions

RRepublicanTX-17 · Representative
55
/ 100
Average
Attendance99
Avg: 96
Independence1
Avg: 4
Bipartisan Tone23
Avg: 16
Ethics Record100
Avg: 99
Transparency39
Avg: 57

Accountability Score — composite of attendance, independence, bipartisan tone, ethics record & transparency.

Methodology
OverviewStatementsBillsFinanceVotesElections
6
Wins
0
Losses
6
Races

2024

House · TX-17
Won
RPeter SessionsWinner
193,101 votes66.3%
DMark Lorenzen
97,941 votes33.6%
Margin of victory: +32.7%

In the 2024 House race for TX-17, Peter Sessions (R) defeated Mark Lorenzen (D) 66.3% to 33.6%. Peter Sessions received 193,101 votes compared to 97,941 for Mark Lorenzen, a dominant 32.7-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Peter Sessions benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. The 2024 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Republican column for the foreseeable future.

2022

House · TX-17
Won
RPeter SessionsWinner
144,408 votes66.5%
DMary Jo Woods
72,801 votes33.5%
Margin of victory: +33.0%

In the 2022 House race for TX-17, Peter Sessions (R) defeated Mary Jo Woods (D) 66.5% to 33.5%. Peter Sessions received 144,408 votes compared to 72,801 for Mary Jo Woods, a dominant 33.0-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Peter Sessions benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. As a Republican, Peter Sessions benefited from the historical midterm penalty against the president's party — with a Democrat in the White House, the opposition typically gains seats. The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Republican column for the foreseeable future.

2020

House · TX-17
Won
RPeter SessionsWinner
171,390 votes55.9%
DRick Kennedy
125,565 votes40.9%
LTed Brown
9,918 votes3.2%
Margin of victory: +14.9%

In the 2020 House race for TX-17, Peter Sessions (R) won with 55.9% of the vote, defeating Rick Kennedy (D) who received 40.9%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. Peter Sessions's 14.9-point lead over the runner-up showed solid but not overwhelming support.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Bill Flores (R) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2020 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.

2016

House · TX-32
Won
RPete SessionsWinner
162,868 votes71.1%
LEd Rankin
43,490 votes19.0%
GGary Stuard
22,813 votes9.9%

In the 2016 House race for TX-32, Pete Sessions (R) won with 71.1% of the vote, defeating Ed Rankin (L) who received 19.0%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. Pete Sessions's 52.1-point advantage over the runner-up confirmed a comfortable win.

As the incumbent, Pete Sessions benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. The 2016 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.

2014

House · TX-32
Won
RPete SessionsWinner
96,495 votes61.8%
DFrank Perez
55,325 votes35.4%
LEd Rankin
4,276 votes2.7%

In the 2014 House race for TX-32, Pete Sessions (R) won with 61.8% of the vote, defeating Frank Perez (D) who received 35.4%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. Pete Sessions's 26.4-point advantage over the runner-up confirmed a comfortable win.

As the incumbent, Pete Sessions benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. As a Republican, Pete Sessions benefited from the historical midterm penalty against the president's party — with a Democrat in the White House, the opposition typically gains seats.

2012

House · TX-32
Won
RPete SessionsWinner
146,653 votes58.3%
DKatherine Savers Mcgovern
99,288 votes39.5%
LSeth Hollist
5,695 votes2.3%

In the 2012 House race for TX-32, Pete Sessions (R) won with 58.3% of the vote, defeating Katherine Savers Mcgovern (D) who received 39.5%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. Pete Sessions's 18.8-point advantage over the runner-up confirmed a comfortable win.

This was an open-seat race. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2012 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.