Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

RRepublicanWI-3 · Representative
54
/ 100
Average
Attendance90
Avg: 96
Independence4
Avg: 4
Bipartisan Tone—
Avg: 16
Ethics Record100
Avg: 99
Transparency0
Avg: 57

Accountability Score — composite of attendance, independence, bipartisan tone, ethics record & transparency. Limited data available — score will improve as voting and statement records accumulate.

Methodology
OverviewStatementsBillsFinanceVotesElections
2
Wins
1
Losses
3
Races

2024

House · WI-3
Won
RDerrick Van OrdenWinner
212,064 votes51.3%
DRebecca Cooke
200,808 votes48.6%
O
309 votes0.1%
Margin of victory: +2.7%

In the 2024 House race for WI-3, Derrick Van Orden (R) won with 51.3% of the vote, defeating Rebecca Cooke (D) who received 48.6%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. The 2.7-point margin made this one of the more competitive races of the cycle.

As the incumbent, Derrick Van Orden benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. The 2024 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. Given the narrow margin, this seat is likely to remain competitive and attract heavy investment in the next cycle.

2022

House · WI-3
Won
RDerrick Van OrdenWinner
164,743 votes51.8%
DBrad Pfaff
152,977 votes48.1%
O
202 votes0.1%
Margin of victory: +3.7%

In the 2022 House race for WI-3, Derrick Van Orden (R) won with 51.8% of the vote, defeating Brad Pfaff (D) who received 48.1%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. The 3.7-point margin made this one of the more competitive races of the cycle.

This race flipped the seat from Democrat to Republican. Ron Kind (D) held the seat previously but either retired or lost in a primary. Party flips at the seat level are relatively rare and often signal shifting district dynamics. As a Republican, Derrick Van Orden benefited from the historical midterm penalty against the president's party — with a Democrat in the White House, the opposition typically gains seats. This seat will likely stay on party watch lists as potentially competitive in future cycles.

2020

House · WI-3
Lost
DRon KindWinner
199,870 votes51.3%
RDerrick Van Orden
189,524 votes48.6%
O
224 votes0.1%

In the 2020 House race for WI-3, Ron Kind (D) won with 51.3% of the vote, defeating Derrick Van Orden (R) who received 48.6%. A third candidate also appeared on the ballot. The 2.7-point margin made this one of the more competitive races of the cycle.

This was an open-seat race. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2020 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. Given the narrow margin, this seat is likely to remain competitive and attract heavy investment in the next cycle.